Originally published at forbidden to speak. Please leave Any comments there.
Introvigne on his article The five faces of Islam and the key to the future of Egypt says
(...) .. a penalty , moderate Muslims do not exist. Travel the length and breadth of the Muslim-majority countries, from Morocco to Malaysia, I've never met one. Conversely, in Italy I had many difficulties to meet a Muslim who does not claim to be "moderate" .. (...)
If "we use three criteria proposed in his travels to Turkey by Pope Benedict XVI and the Holy Land as a condition for dialogue with Islam - unconditional rejection of terrorism (which means that not only condemns Hamas and the Al Qaeda), respect for human rights in generally, including those of women, freedom of religious minorities not only as freedom of worship but also the mission, resulting in the Law of the Muslim who adheres to this preaching to convert to Christianity - and call it "moderate" who meets these criteria , are not "moderate" or the king of Saudi Arabia nor the Muslim Brotherhood, or Bin Laden. But while we come to this necessary Finally, we notice that the grid that divides a half billion Muslims into "moderates" and "terrorists" is blatantly inappropriate, because it puts on the same side of cutthroat profession and sworn enemies of Al Qaeda as Saudi King Abdullah and pro-American and anti-American, a distinction in the Middle East and elsewhere is not just irrelevant. "(...) (Introvigne)
the point is that the secularists have a sense of progress that mystified by the fact even to survive his own idea, to the point of giving all responsibility of the current conflict "to misunderstandings, "the history and sociology and even the church ... while a dialogue is possible only deepening their own idendità .
But if you do this, IF IT IS FOR DIALOGUE, you should not assume that the result is peace, why can not be imposed from the person moves .
And the opposite of peace is war, but not necessarily be the patience of a true relationship.
You can not always think of the interlocutor who acts in a certain way because they did not understand. This indeed it is offensive.
So first of all should keep in mind what the dialogue with another man. dialogue with a man who did not accept the truth revealed, and has instead embraced uun'altra faith should necessarily be tricky. True, but shrewd. Respectful but shrewd. Instead there are those who thinks he can solve all by showing its good intentions, continue to live in sin. But it is precisely in this division with Islam: Our company is a chaotic and schizophrenic, separated at home, would wonder what he has to give ... and what's valuable and recognized as a widespread mentality. ? Our laws and the structure of our society will be our ruin if not born a human being, that is genuinely religious.
0 comments:
Post a Comment